<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eric Pender &#187; Reputation Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericpender.com/blog/category/reputation-management/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericpender.com</link>
	<description>Chicago SEO Expert &#124; Eric Pender &#124; EricPender.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:37:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Okay to Say You&#8217;re Sorry</title>
		<link>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/its-okay-to-say-youre-sorry</link>
		<comments>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/its-okay-to-say-youre-sorry#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Pender</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericpender.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw this post from Signal vs. Noise, where it references an apology letter from Hulu regarding the removal of some episodes of  &#8220;It&#8217;s Always Sunny in Philidelphia&#8221;. It just strikes me how rarely companies openly acknowledge mistakes.  I have to say that more often than not, companies appear to view reputation managment a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I just saw <a href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/1534-hulu-ceo-we-screwed-up-royally" target="_blank">this post</a> from Signal vs. Noise, where it references an <a href="http://www.hulu.com/its-always-sunny-in-philadelphia" target="_blank">apology letter from Hulu</a> regarding the removal of some episodes of  &#8220;It&#8217;s Always Sunny in Philidelphia&#8221;.</p>
<p>It just strikes me how rarely companies openly acknowledge mistakes.  I have to say that more often than not, companies appear to view reputation managment a way to &#8220;cover up&#8221; their misdeeds and mistakes, rather than manage the repair of their reputation by engaging with their communities and stakeholders.  They approach the term reputation management as though it&#8217;s a one-sided affair, that all it takes is a good PR team to spin their problems away.</p>
<p>Yet in this age of <a href="http://ericpender.com/2008/12/07/living-in-a-world-of-hyperbole/" target="_blank">brand building and hyperbole</a> (the brand is bigger than the sum of it&#8217;s parts, and that&#8217;s not a good thing), the companies that are acknowledging that they have a human side are resonating with consumers.  What, you weren&#8217;t aware that brands actually had human beings working within their four walls?  It is true my friends.</p>
<p>Three examples from Twitter are readily available.  The pioneer is <a href="http://twitter.com/comcastcares" target="_blank">@ComcastCares</a>.  That&#8217;s right, Comcast, the bain of just about everyone&#8217;s cable and Internet providers existence, has a representative (his name is Frank Eliason)  directly answering questions and working to solve customer complains via Twitter.</p>
<p>The second example is from 1-800-Flowers.  I had posted a (somewhat smarmy) tweet asking why the founder of 1-800-Flowers had his picture on all of his advertisements in the city.  I didn&#8217;t expect a response, I simply wanted to make an observation, a sort of localized rhetorical question if you will.  A few days later, I received a reply from <a href="http://twitter.com/1800flowers" target="_blank">@1800flowers</a>, letting me know that the founder Jim was a florist originally and that for him, 1-800-Flowers is a family business.  Now, I still may not agree about putting his face on all of the ads, but because someone reached out to me to provide an explanation, I have a very favorable perception of 1-800-Flowers.</p>
<p>The third example is one I just heard of this weekend, that Bank of America has a Twitter account <a href="http://twitter.com/BofA_help" target="_blank">@BofA_help</a>.  That&#8217;s right, a major bank with a name and, oh my God, a face!</p>
<p>The point is, companies are by definition fictitous entities.  They&#8217;re not real, at least not in the way that people are real.  Companies have spent so much time brand building that they have become entirely impersonnal.  And then they wonder why they cannot connect with their consumers.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to be small and human all of the time.  But when it comes to things like customer service and support, smaller and human is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/its-okay-to-say-youre-sorry/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Living in a World of Hyperbole</title>
		<link>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/living-in-a-world-of-hyperbole</link>
		<comments>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/living-in-a-world-of-hyperbole#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Pender</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pendercode.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/living-in-a-world-of-hyperbole/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just about every day, I am reminded in one way or another that we live in a world of hyperbole.  Overstatement.  Smoke and mirrors. Companies are obsessed with &#8220;The Brand.&#8221;  Building it, preserving it, growing it. But you can&#8217;t build The Brand until you have The Product.  The Service. Putting lipstick on the pig?  Hell, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Just about every day, I am reminded in one way or another that we live in a world of hyperbole.  Overstatement.  Smoke and mirrors.</p>
<div>Companies are obsessed with &#8220;The Brand.&#8221;  Building it, preserving it, growing it.</div>
<div>But you can&#8217;t build The Brand until you have The Product.  The Service.</div>
<div>Putting lipstick on the pig?  Hell, we&#8217;ve bought the pig a new wardrobe, sent it to the nail salon, and posted it&#8217;s beauty shots on Facebook.</div>
<div>Consumers look past the beauty shots.  Instead, they go to grainy videos of the real product that someone posted on YouTube.</div>
<div>Even if the bulk of consumers aren&#8217;t reading that hands-on review that some guy threw up on his blog shortly after your product launched, the mainstream reporter convering the beat in your industry certainly is reading.  So is that investment analyst.  So is your boss.  Wait, what&#8217;s that you say?  Your boss is more concerned about the message that is going out than he is about the messages that are coming in?  If that&#8217;s the case, you got big problems my friend.</div>
<div>Keep this in mind: a brand that is built around a shoddy product or service is called a bubble.  And bubbles burst.</div>
<div>If your view of reputation management is to squash what&#8217;s being said about you, then you&#8217;re only working to delay the inevitable.  The truth will emerge.  So what are you going to do about it?  The companies that succeed are the ones that join the conversation.</div>
<div>It&#8217;s like that party you go to, the one with the girl or guy who&#8217;s well dressed and attractive.  Only to find out that when you strike up conversation, all they talk about is himself or herself.  No substance.  No exchange of ideas.  Just a one-sided affair of one person talking at another person.  We&#8217;ve all been there, and we all know it&#8217;s a short conversation.</div>
<div>What&#8217;s the point?  The point is we need to quit with the hyperbole.  We can&#8217;t stand hyperbolic people, why do companies think we like hyperbolic brands?  If you&#8217;re the best, fine, tell me about it.  But if you&#8217;re not the best, what, do you think I&#8217;m not going to find out?  Even if I buy your product, don&#8217;t you realize that if I end up unhappy, I&#8217;m going to tell all of my friends?</div>
<div>Build a decent product and tell me it&#8217;s a decent product, then I&#8217;ll probably be willing to give you another chance.  But build an awful prodcut and tell me it&#8217;s great?  Well, in that case, I&#8217;m writing a blog post about it, digging relevant articles on Digg, and reviewing it on Yelp.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/living-in-a-world-of-hyperbole/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
