<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eric Pender &#187; Competitive Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericpender.com/blog/category/competitive-analysis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericpender.com</link>
	<description>Chicago SEO Expert &#124; Eric Pender &#124; EricPender.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:37:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Deep Pages with Google Sitelinks</title>
		<link>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/deep-pages-with-google-sitelinks</link>
		<comments>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/deep-pages-with-google-sitelinks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Pender</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competitive Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitelinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericpender.com/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are plugged in to my Twitter feed you may have already seen this, as I posted this earlier today.  I found this while I was doing some competitive analysis of the SEO efforts for Toyota and Honda, among others. Both Honda and Toyota, among others, are getting Google Sitelinks to their deep pages.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>If you are plugged in to my <a href="http://twitter.com/ericpender" target="_blank">Twitter</a> feed you may have already seen this, as I posted this earlier today.  I found this while I was doing some competitive analysis of the SEO efforts for Toyota and Honda, among others.</p>
<p>Both Honda and Toyota, among others, are getting Google Sitelinks to their deep pages.  We&#8217;ve all seen Sitelinks for companies whose websites are highly relevant for a specific query.  But I have never seen Sitelinks going to a deep page before.  Not only are they Sitelinks for a deep page, but they&#8217;re Sitelink for a deep page on a subdomain!</p>
<div id="attachment_265" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 398px">
	<img class="size-full wp-image-265  " style="border: 2px solid black;" title="sitelinks-deep-pages" src="http://www.ericpender.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/sitelinks-deep-pages.png" alt="Google Sitelinks for Civic Deep Page" width="398" height="120" />
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Google Sitelinks for Civic Deep Page</p>
</div>
<p>I think this is a great example of why very good internal site architecture is critical to search engine optimization.  Historically, automotive manufacturer websites have been experiential sites, often using a lot of Flash not only for the imagery but for the navigation menus as well.</p>
<div id="attachment_266" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 300px">
	<img class="size-medium wp-image-266 " style="border: 2px solid black;" title="honda-flash-navigation-menu" src="http://www.ericpender.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/honda-flash-navigation-menu-300x208.png" alt="Honda's Flash Navigation Menu" width="300" height="208" />
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Honda&#39;s Flash Navigation Menu</p>
</div>
<p>As experienced SEOs know, these Flash navigation menus create significant crawlability issues for the search engines.  Honda is using an HTML underlayer beneith their Flash naviation that mirrors their main Flash navigation.  Not only are they using an HTML underlayer, but they have programmed it so that they layout is attractive to the user.</p>
<div id="attachment_267" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 300px">
	<img class="size-medium wp-image-267 " style="border: 2px solid black;" title="honda-html-navigation-layer" src="http://www.ericpender.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/honda-html-navigation-layer-300x208.png" alt="Honda's HTML layer underneith Flash" width="300" height="208" />
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Honda&#39;s HTML layer underneith Flash</p>
</div>
<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It is important to point out here that using an HTML layer under your Flash is completely okay in the eyes of the search engines as long as you mirror the Flash content.<span> </span>If you create an HTML layer under your Flash and just plug a hundred different keywords, that&#8217;s not okay.<span> </span>But if the HTML text is a replicaiton of your Flash content, you should be in the clear.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">Honda doesn&#8217;t muddy up their HTML layer.<span> </span>It is just a very basic, well-laid out replicaiton of their Flash navigation.<span> </span>The search engines can easily crawl these links, and if users have JavaScript or Flash turned off, they can still easily get to the deep pages of the site.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">By creating very clear internal site architecture that can be easily crawled by search engines, even Honda&#8217;s deep pages have been able to achieve sitelinks.<span> </span>I would be curious to know the click-through rate and traffic increases for users whose search returns a Sitelinks result versus results that do not include Sitelinks.<span> </span>So far, I have seen some reported cases of traffic increases exceeding 30%.</p>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/deep-pages-with-google-sitelinks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Analyze Keyword Research</title>
		<link>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/how-to-analyze-keyword-research</link>
		<comments>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/how-to-analyze-keyword-research#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Pender</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competitive Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericpender.com/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the biggest mistakes I see when it comes to analyzing keyword research is the singular focus on keyword traffic.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, traffic is very important.  However, we sometimes get overzealous when looking at the projected traffic metrics when it comes to keyword research.  Clients see high traffic numbers in your keyword [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>One of the biggest mistakes I see when it comes to analyzing keyword research is the singular focus on keyword traffic.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, traffic is very important.  However, we sometimes get overzealous when looking at the projected traffic metrics when it comes to keyword research.  Clients see high traffic numbers in your keyword research reports and start drooling.  &#8220;We want the traffic, get us that traffic,&#8221; they clamor!  Just focusing on traffic, however, overlooks higher-level analysis points of keyword research.</p>
<p>Generally speaking, there are three major phases of analyzing keyword research:</p>
<ol>
<li>Traffic</li>
<li>Competition</li>
<li>Conversion Rate</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Traffic</strong></p>
<p>Once you have a pretty good list of possible SEO keywords, you are going to want to look at the traffic projections for each keyword.  There are many tools out there to help you find these projections.  My favorite is the <a href="https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal" target="_blank">Google Keyword Tool</a>.  Even though this is an AdWords tool, I still like to use it for SEO keywords.  I&#8217;m not really looking at <em>absolute</em> traffic numbers when I use this tool (or any tool, for that matter).  I&#8217;m really just looking at <em>relative</em> traffic estimates to compare each individual word against the larger list.</p>
<p><strong>Competition</strong></p>
<p>The next factor to look at after you get traffic estimates is to try to get a feel for each keyword&#8217;s competitiveness.  You can do this a number of different ways.  At a very basic level, you can look at the total number of results Google returns for a given query.</p>
<div id="attachment_133" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 500px">
	<img class="size-full wp-image-133" title="Widgets" src="http://pendercode.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/picture-12.png" alt="The query widget has 129,000,000 results." width="500" height="85" />
	<p class="wp-caption-text">The query widget has 129,000,000 results.</p>
</div>
<p>This method, however, is a rather basic way to look and competition.  A more effective way to judge the competitiveness of a keyword is to look at how many results are returned when you use some of the advanced search operators such as intitle and inanchor.  When we combine these operators together, we can see how many results contain our keyword in both the title tag of the web page and the anchor text point to the page.  This is our direct SEO traffic.</p>
<p>Ideally you will want to target keywords that have higher levels of traffic and lower levels of competition.  Of course, higher trafficked terms tend to have higher competition levels, so you will have to make a decision as to whether or not you will be able to rank highly for words with high levels of traffic and competition.</p>
<p><strong>Conversion Rate</strong></p>
<p>Conversion rate is the most overlooked point of analysis when it comes to search engine optimization keyword research.  Too many times, SEO consultants look at traffic and competition and then make their decision on which keywords to target.  Missing the critical step of analyzing conversion rates means that you may be choosing keywords that will send a high volume of visitors, but that may not convert when they get to the site.</p>
<p>Sometimes, you will be able to look into your analytics package to see historical conversion rates for keywords that you are thinking about targeting.  However,  many times you may find yourself in situations where your goals were not set up properly in your analytics package (or your goals have changed), or you were not getting much traffic to these target phrases so you do not have a statistically significant sample to pull conversion data from.</p>
<p>In scenarios where you do not have reliable conversion data to draw conclusions from, it is best to test your keywords in PPC.  Testing your keywords in PPC allows you to see what keywords drive the most traffic, have high or low levels of competition, and convert at the highest rates.  You can even test different landing pages to determine which keyword should be targeted to a specific page.</p>
<p>It is easy to get caught in the trap of simply looking at traffic and competition levels when doing SEO keyword research.  Adding conversion rate metrics into the analysis process adds an additional level of confidence that the keywords you decide to target not only generate traffic, but generate the <em>right</em> traffic that converts on your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ericpender.com/blog/how-to-analyze-keyword-research/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
